Tampa is a sprawling city and traffic can get quite heavy. Thus, it is not unusual to find oneself in an auto accident if not properly paying attention to the road. Following an auto accident, when both sides claim a different series of events that led up to it, how will your accident attorney in Tampa prove the case to your advantage?
Who Is Right and Who Is Wrong?
When an accident occurs, drivers may not always “remember” exactly what happened. They will often give their version of the event and likely tailor it in their favor. So, when you have two people pointing fingers at each other, how do you determine who’s at fault? At this point, it’s best to get in contact with an accident attorney so they can review all the circumstances and find the best angle to prove the fault belongs to the other driver.
What Will Your Attorney Do for You?
They will compare all the data, information and evidence to prove your case – and will also assess the credibility of the other driver’s statements and actions.
Your accident attorney in Tampa will review any unbiased witness statements if they are available and when this is combined with all the physical evidence, there may be sufficient proof that one driver is not telling the whole truth.
Individuals assessing your claim will believe that witnesses are biased towards one party or the other and it is only an unbiased witness that can offer reliable testimony.
Photographs taken immediately after the accident may be able to prove or disprove the version of events provided by both drivers. This may be sufficient to stop the case from going to court and agreeing to a settlement at the very earliest stage.
The police will also gather their report surrounding the circumstances, and this is available to your accident attorney in Tampa as part of the documentation that will be required, should the case head to court.
Should an individual be injured, the police will be involved at the earliest possible stage. Where a small amount of damage is incurred to one or more vehicles, the state may not require the police to attend, but the court will always favor the testimony from police officers, especially when compared to biased drivers.